Documenti full-text disponibili:
|
Documento PDF (English)
- Richiede un lettore di PDF come Xpdf o Adobe Acrobat Reader
Disponibile con Licenza: Salvo eventuali più ampie autorizzazioni dell'autore, la tesi può essere liberamente consultata e può essere effettuato il salvataggio e la stampa di una copia per fini strettamente personali di studio, di ricerca e di insegnamento, con espresso divieto di qualunque utilizzo direttamente o indirettamente commerciale. Ogni altro diritto sul materiale è riservato.
Download (6MB)
|
Abstract
The continuous evolution of mobile network technology is leading to the 5th Generation (5G) of cellular networks, a level of development that exhibits unprecedented network features, capability, and intelligence. New technological cost–efficient solutions are, therefore, required to boost the network capacity and advance its capabilities in order to support the Quality of Service
(QoS) requirements. Network densification is known to be as one of the promising approaches aiming to increase the network capacity and reduce latency. For example, Heterogeneous Wireless Networks (HWN) can provide flexible and diverse network access to the users by integration of different wireless technologies. By introducing dense and diverse networks,
the importance of network coordination and automated controllability has never been higher. Despite the advantages of network densifications, there
are challenges that have to be addressed properly in order to use the best performance of heterogeneous networks. An example of HWN is the 5 GHz unlicensed band which is open to different wireless systems such as WiFi or Unlicensed LTE. The presence of the two mentioned OFDM-based systems in the same band rise the importance of studying their performance when sharing the same band with the other technologies and introduce new models
and methods to reach the friendly coexistence. Another example of dense networks is roaming, especially in the 5G systems, with ever-increasing heterogeneous
users. In the small cells and densified networks, Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) need to share their mobile networks with other operators more often to reduce the operator investment costs on infrastructure. Thus,
the mobile networks are transferring from uniquely own single authorities to complex interactions among heterogeneous participants which rise the need for a new level of controllability.
Abstract
The continuous evolution of mobile network technology is leading to the 5th Generation (5G) of cellular networks, a level of development that exhibits unprecedented network features, capability, and intelligence. New technological cost–efficient solutions are, therefore, required to boost the network capacity and advance its capabilities in order to support the Quality of Service
(QoS) requirements. Network densification is known to be as one of the promising approaches aiming to increase the network capacity and reduce latency. For example, Heterogeneous Wireless Networks (HWN) can provide flexible and diverse network access to the users by integration of different wireless technologies. By introducing dense and diverse networks,
the importance of network coordination and automated controllability has never been higher. Despite the advantages of network densifications, there
are challenges that have to be addressed properly in order to use the best performance of heterogeneous networks. An example of HWN is the 5 GHz unlicensed band which is open to different wireless systems such as WiFi or Unlicensed LTE. The presence of the two mentioned OFDM-based systems in the same band rise the importance of studying their performance when sharing the same band with the other technologies and introduce new models
and methods to reach the friendly coexistence. Another example of dense networks is roaming, especially in the 5G systems, with ever-increasing heterogeneous
users. In the small cells and densified networks, Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) need to share their mobile networks with other operators more often to reduce the operator investment costs on infrastructure. Thus,
the mobile networks are transferring from uniquely own single authorities to complex interactions among heterogeneous participants which rise the need for a new level of controllability.
Tipologia del documento
Tesi di dottorato
Autore
Mafakheri, Babak
Supervisore
Co-supervisore
Dottorato di ricerca
Ciclo
32
Coordinatore
Settore disciplinare
Settore concorsuale
Parole chiave
4G, 5G, 5 GHz band, Aggregate Interference, Blockchain, Distributed Ledger, Energy Detection, Heterogeneous Networks, Hyperledger, LAA, Poisson Process, SD-RAN, Smart Contracts, Stochastic Geometry, Unlicensed LTE, (Un)Saturated Throughput, Wireless LAN.
URN:NBN
DOI
10.6092/unibo/amsdottorato/9257
Data di discussione
1 Aprile 2020
URI
Altri metadati
Tipologia del documento
Tesi di dottorato
Autore
Mafakheri, Babak
Supervisore
Co-supervisore
Dottorato di ricerca
Ciclo
32
Coordinatore
Settore disciplinare
Settore concorsuale
Parole chiave
4G, 5G, 5 GHz band, Aggregate Interference, Blockchain, Distributed Ledger, Energy Detection, Heterogeneous Networks, Hyperledger, LAA, Poisson Process, SD-RAN, Smart Contracts, Stochastic Geometry, Unlicensed LTE, (Un)Saturated Throughput, Wireless LAN.
URN:NBN
DOI
10.6092/unibo/amsdottorato/9257
Data di discussione
1 Aprile 2020
URI
Statistica sui download
Gestione del documento: