Reyhani, Milad
(2024)
Assessment and optimization of green wall systems: a life cycle perspective, [Dissertation thesis], Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna.
Dottorato di ricerca in
Salute, sicurezza e sistemi del verde, 36 Ciclo.
Documenti full-text disponibili:
|
Documento PDF (English)
- Accesso riservato fino a 14 Maggio 2027
- Richiede un lettore di PDF come Xpdf o Adobe Acrobat Reader
Disponibile con Licenza: Salvo eventuali più ampie autorizzazioni dell'autore, la tesi può essere liberamente consultata e può essere effettuato il salvataggio e la stampa di una copia per fini strettamente personali di studio, di ricerca e di insegnamento, con espresso divieto di qualunque utilizzo direttamente o indirettamente commerciale. Ogni altro diritto sul materiale è riservato.
Download (2MB)
| Contatta l'autore
|
Abstract
Urban environments are continuously evolving, seeking innovative solutions to enhance sustainability and ecological balance. Green wall systems have emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges, offering benefits like improved air quality, biodiversity, and thermal regulation. This thesis presents a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of three distinct green wall systems: the Italian Plastic-Based Green Wall (IPB-GW), the Italian Felt-Based Green Wall (IFB-GW), and the Australian Plastic-Based Green Wall (APB-GW), examining their environmental impacts across production, construction, and maintenance phases.
Employing robust methodologies aligned with ISO 14040 standards and utilizing advanced analytical tools such as OpenLCA software and the Ecoinvent® v3.7 database, the study unfolds in three phases. Initially, a comparative analysis between IPB-GW and IFB-GW is performed, uncovering the nuanced environmental implications of material choices, design intricacies, and operational practices. Subsequently, various scenarios are explored within each system to assess the potential for environmental performance optimization. Finally, the APB-GW is introduced, offering a broader perspective on global green wall technologies.
The findings indicate that while green wall systems are instrumental in enhancing urban ecosystems, their environmental sustainability is intricately tied to material selection, design, and maintenance. The IFB-GW generally exhibits higher environmental impacts, primarily due to the use of aluminum and inorganic fertilizers. In contrast, the IPB-GW presents its own set of challenges, particularly related to polypropylene use and potting soil composition. The APB-GW, with its superior performance in various environmental impact categories, showcases the importance of material innovation and efficient irrigation systems.
This research provides valuable insights for urban planners, architects, and environmental policymakers, emphasizing the necessity of sustainable material selection, resource-efficient design, and integrated water management practices. As urban areas continue to expand, the integration of green wall systems offers a sustainable pathway to enhance the quality of life, biodiversity, and ecological resilience in urban settings.
Abstract
Urban environments are continuously evolving, seeking innovative solutions to enhance sustainability and ecological balance. Green wall systems have emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges, offering benefits like improved air quality, biodiversity, and thermal regulation. This thesis presents a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of three distinct green wall systems: the Italian Plastic-Based Green Wall (IPB-GW), the Italian Felt-Based Green Wall (IFB-GW), and the Australian Plastic-Based Green Wall (APB-GW), examining their environmental impacts across production, construction, and maintenance phases.
Employing robust methodologies aligned with ISO 14040 standards and utilizing advanced analytical tools such as OpenLCA software and the Ecoinvent® v3.7 database, the study unfolds in three phases. Initially, a comparative analysis between IPB-GW and IFB-GW is performed, uncovering the nuanced environmental implications of material choices, design intricacies, and operational practices. Subsequently, various scenarios are explored within each system to assess the potential for environmental performance optimization. Finally, the APB-GW is introduced, offering a broader perspective on global green wall technologies.
The findings indicate that while green wall systems are instrumental in enhancing urban ecosystems, their environmental sustainability is intricately tied to material selection, design, and maintenance. The IFB-GW generally exhibits higher environmental impacts, primarily due to the use of aluminum and inorganic fertilizers. In contrast, the IPB-GW presents its own set of challenges, particularly related to polypropylene use and potting soil composition. The APB-GW, with its superior performance in various environmental impact categories, showcases the importance of material innovation and efficient irrigation systems.
This research provides valuable insights for urban planners, architects, and environmental policymakers, emphasizing the necessity of sustainable material selection, resource-efficient design, and integrated water management practices. As urban areas continue to expand, the integration of green wall systems offers a sustainable pathway to enhance the quality of life, biodiversity, and ecological resilience in urban settings.
Tipologia del documento
Tesi di dottorato
Autore
Reyhani, Milad
Supervisore
Co-supervisore
Dottorato di ricerca
Ciclo
36
Coordinatore
Settore disciplinare
Settore concorsuale
Parole chiave
Green Wall Systems, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Environmental Impact, Sustainability, Nature
Based Solutions
URN:NBN
Data di discussione
19 Giugno 2024
URI
Altri metadati
Tipologia del documento
Tesi di dottorato
Autore
Reyhani, Milad
Supervisore
Co-supervisore
Dottorato di ricerca
Ciclo
36
Coordinatore
Settore disciplinare
Settore concorsuale
Parole chiave
Green Wall Systems, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Environmental Impact, Sustainability, Nature
Based Solutions
URN:NBN
Data di discussione
19 Giugno 2024
URI
Gestione del documento: