Kovács, Anna
(2024)
Against all odds: mobilization for large-scale collective action in the case of climate change, [Dissertation thesis], Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna.
Dottorato di ricerca in
European doctorate in law and economics, 35 Ciclo.
Documenti full-text disponibili:
Abstract
The development of modern human society brought with it new and complicated problems – controlling epidemics and pandemics in an increasingly interconnected world; the challenges brought about by cross-country migration; antibiotic resistance; and climate change, one of the most complicated of all major problems facing society today. These are all large-scale collective action problems (LSCAPs). At the same time, the very existence of certain policy areas remains puzzling. Although extensive scholarly attention has been paid to the successes and failures of providing collective and public goods, limited to no attention has been paid to the point of emergence of a collective action problem. We assume that there is a group that recognizes a collective good as such, and the need for providing it. However, the point of recognizing the good as such is missing from existing theoretical accounts. Essentially, how is a collective action group formed? How is a collective good recognized as such? How do entire policy areas emerge out of little to no pre-existing policy or legislation, depending on the subject matter, to provide these goods? How does that process of mass-mobilization look like? What brings about (mobilization for) major policy change? This work uses the example of (international) climate change policy to analyze how climate change transformed from a primarily scientific issue to a policy area of international concern. The findings indicate that some aspects of the emergence of large-scale cooperation on climate change could simply be explained by elements found in classic collective action theory. This dissertation also finds that, although the rational-choice based approach may explain a fair bit when considering the characteristics or level of ambition of early climate change policy, when focusing on its emergence as a policy issue on its own right, however, the rational-choice explanation may be expanded by behavioral factors.
Abstract
The development of modern human society brought with it new and complicated problems – controlling epidemics and pandemics in an increasingly interconnected world; the challenges brought about by cross-country migration; antibiotic resistance; and climate change, one of the most complicated of all major problems facing society today. These are all large-scale collective action problems (LSCAPs). At the same time, the very existence of certain policy areas remains puzzling. Although extensive scholarly attention has been paid to the successes and failures of providing collective and public goods, limited to no attention has been paid to the point of emergence of a collective action problem. We assume that there is a group that recognizes a collective good as such, and the need for providing it. However, the point of recognizing the good as such is missing from existing theoretical accounts. Essentially, how is a collective action group formed? How is a collective good recognized as such? How do entire policy areas emerge out of little to no pre-existing policy or legislation, depending on the subject matter, to provide these goods? How does that process of mass-mobilization look like? What brings about (mobilization for) major policy change? This work uses the example of (international) climate change policy to analyze how climate change transformed from a primarily scientific issue to a policy area of international concern. The findings indicate that some aspects of the emergence of large-scale cooperation on climate change could simply be explained by elements found in classic collective action theory. This dissertation also finds that, although the rational-choice based approach may explain a fair bit when considering the characteristics or level of ambition of early climate change policy, when focusing on its emergence as a policy issue on its own right, however, the rational-choice explanation may be expanded by behavioral factors.
Tipologia del documento
Tesi di dottorato
Autore
Kovács, Anna
Supervisore
Co-supervisore
Dottorato di ricerca
Ciclo
35
Coordinatore
Settore disciplinare
Settore concorsuale
Parole chiave
collective action; collective action theory; large-scale collective action; climate change policy; behavioral law and economics; law and economics; climate change law and economics
Data di discussione
5 Dicembre 2024
URI
Altri metadati
Tipologia del documento
Tesi di dottorato
Autore
Kovács, Anna
Supervisore
Co-supervisore
Dottorato di ricerca
Ciclo
35
Coordinatore
Settore disciplinare
Settore concorsuale
Parole chiave
collective action; collective action theory; large-scale collective action; climate change policy; behavioral law and economics; law and economics; climate change law and economics
Data di discussione
5 Dicembre 2024
URI
Gestione del documento: