Kissing stenting of aortic bifurcation for aorto-iliac obstructive disease: a comparison between bare metal stents and covered stents

INTRODUCTION Aim of this multicentric study:to compare the short-and mid-term results of bare metal stents(BMS)and covered stents(CS)in the Kissing Stent(KS)technique. METHODS Patients undertaking a KS with BMS or CS between January 2017-August 2021 included. Morphological features of plaques were classified as per the extension of calcifications and thrombosis. Every endpoint and outcome was compared in relation to BMS or CS. All patients included received dual anti-platelets DAPT)for at least one month. RESULTS Thirty-four patients enrolled,17 treated with BMS and 17 with CS. Average age 66 years. The 80% of patients were part of TASC C-D categories. DAPT was administered to 82.4%(28/34)of patients with a mean duration of 4.4±1.6 months. Mean follow-up 32.1±17.8 months. Technical Success was 100%. Immediate Clinical Success was reached in 29 cases(85.3%). Immediate and 30-day Clinical Success was higher in CS(64.7% vs 100%, p=.01). Overall Clinical Success at 1-year follow-up was 91.2%,and resulted significantly higher in CS(82.4% vs 100%,p .04). Overall Primary Patency,Assisted Patency,and Secondary Patency at 30 days were 97.1%,97.1%,and 100%,without differences between BMS and CS(94.1% vs 100%,94.1% vs 100%,and 100% vs 100%;p =.7). Two cases(5.9%)of thrombosis were registered,and both occurred within 3 months after the procedure and both in the BMS,without statistical differences with the CS group(11.8% vs 0%,p .48). Both cases of thrombosis occurred in patients who were not treated with dual antiplatelet therapy(33.3% vs 0%,p .027). Survival statistically differed only at the mean follow-up in favour of CS(70.6% and 100%,p .04). CONCLUSIONS The endovascular approach is currently safe and effective in the treatment of AIOD,and KS offers excellent results in particular if performed with CS; however,no statistically significant differences emerged between the two types of stents in terms of patency,reintervention,and complications. DAPT seems to warrant the best results in terms of patency,although there is still no consensus about the ideal duration of administration.