Surgery after biological therapy in locally advanced NSCLC with molecular driver: feasibility and effectiveness of a new multidisciplinary approach

Introduction: Surgical outcomes after biological therapy have not been investigated yet and no information about timing, postoperative complications and survival have been recorded. Methods: This is a prospective study which compares a group of stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC patients treated with biological therapy with patients undergoing standard induction chemotherapy. Data reported are preliminary results on the safety and effectiveness of surgery after target therapy. Results: We compared 22 patients treated with standard chemotherapy (Group 1) and 6 patients who received target therapy (Group 2). No differences were observed with an important bias due to the limited number of cases. The median time of resection was 159.8 ± 62.8 for group 1 and 201 ± 57.8 for group 2 (p=0.194). Complete resection was obtained in all Group 1-cases. Post-operative complication rate was 22% vs 16% (p=1). Pathologists reported necrosis >50% in 13% in group 1, Fibrosis >50% was presents respectively in 27% and 33% of patients (p=1). Residual vital tumor was >50% in 77% of patients undergone CT and in 66% of patients undergone TT (p=0.622). A total of 6 (31%) patients in the CT-group developed recurrence, 3 in the TT- group (64.2%), p was 0.634. No difference was observed both in terms of OS (P=0.29, Figure 3) and in term of DFS (P=0.106, Figure 4). Discussion: There is no consensus in the use of target therapy for advanced tumor in association with surgery. EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors showed higher and more rapid response and our study wants to demonstrate that surgery after target therapy gives full access to the advantage of definitive local treatment. In our series, despite fibrosis, radical surgery has been achieved in all patients operated. The intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complication rate seems to be similar.